Wednesday, 20 February 2013
Samsung Flexible Screen
Here is a little news of CES 2013 show in Las Vegas. Every one aware that CES is the show that is meant for new technology and high tech gadgets and here is the introduction of flexible screens. Samsung presents a prototype display flexible and which is unbreakable. Here a beta version which is not a mobile phone but the dimensions suggest there. It is a flexible OLED display with a resolution greater than 300dpi.
This technology already exists for tablets finally rather simple reading lights. The innovation is to bring this technology on mobile screens ... for what? Else is it a useless gimmick? The answer is Yes and No, the fact that a flexible screen is expected to make it more resistant in the sense that shocks and strains are highly attenuated or even without consequences. So any one can simply guess, that in 2013, Samsung is going to positioning itself strong in the mobile market.
Tuesday, 19 February 2013
Apple does not want to hear about Phablet!
Halfway between the Smartphone and the tablet is the Phablet. These devices whose size is generally between "a little more" 5 inch and "a little less" 7-inch - because there is no precise definition of this category - have long been the preserved Samsung. The Galaxy Note, then the Note II, met some competitors, notably towards China with Huawei Ascend Mate 6.1 inches.
An analyst with investment bank Goldman Sachs has asked Tim Cook if his company had a product in cartons of this type. His answer was quite clear: "The iPhone 5 features, as you know, a new 4-inch screen retina, the screens most advanced in the industry. It also provides a larger size without sacrificing ease of use with one hand that our consumers love. " Simply put, if you want a device to hold with both hands, you iPad or iPad Mini. Phone, Apple must yet be manageable with one hand.
Labels:
apple,
Phablet,
samsung,
smartphones
Issue of Privacy with Google Play Store!
The issue of privacy is a sensitive topic on the internet. The Google application store, the Play Store, finds itself the center of attention after a ticket from a developer who explains to access personal information of users of its program. The download platform is indeed a bit too talkative on those who use it. Once a person download a paid application, some data would then be transmitted to the author. The Australian developer Dan Nolan noticed this detail through the administration console of the shop. With a simple click, you have access to the personal information of users of its application such as name, email address, or the location.
Data by which, with your own admission, could enable him to "stalk and harass users who leave negative reviews are reimbursed or application." In fact, this information is needed particularly in the context of a refund application fee, which is why this data exchange is not about those that are free. The conditions of use of Google Play Store also indicate: "Google may need to provide your personal data, such as your name and e-mail to suppliers in order to process your transactions and / or Content you provide. Google has agreed with the suppliers they use the information in accordance with the rules of confidentiality. '
Data Storage Systems
Online providers of some of the most excellent storage systems are available at nexsan, that have been in business since the year 1999 with headquarters in Thousand Oaks, California, and have installed around 33,000 systems to over 11,000 customers in 60 countries of the world. They are the leaders in san storage system and their E series disk solutions delivers storage density, power management, reliability, with high value block based storage. The san storage system delivers the smallest footprint of around 60 disks in 4U rack space consuming around 85 percent less power when not in use. It is a perfect choice for enterprise class reliability, cost per terabyte optimizing the storage infrastructure for backup and recovery, traditional, virtual and cloud management together with bulk storage. The new version NST5000 provides hybrid of solid state technology with spinning disk for iSCSl and NAS, meeting intensive requirements such as server and desktop database, virtualization etc; providing high performance with a capacity which is affordable. The secure archive systems are the gold standard for data offload, secure cloud deployments and compliance.
These storage solutions are the ideal option for a wide range of applications which include database, surveillance, backup with recovery, bulk storage, VM storage, archive, cloud storage, disaster and recovery, medical imaging, litigation support etc. Their RAID, ATA and SATA disk technologies are capable of handling the storage needs of different sizes of companies with products suitable for medium sized and mid tier deployments in large companies. With products being sold through their channel, users can benefit from deal registration program as well as extensive partner programs and experience a different kind of storage solutions from their products. To obtain additional information, on demand webinar etc: a tour at the site would prove to be beneficial to the viewer. Moreover they are eco friendly with their products using `green AutoMAID’ which is an energy saving technology and a good choice of low power usage with space constrained environment. For a deeper insight on the company and updated news and events, the same can be checked which are displayed at the site for the benefit of the user.
Saturday, 16 February 2013
The Origin of Web Browsers!
Jeff Nelson is often considered the "inventor" of Chrome OS, but it is in fact the inventor of Google OS: it began to develop its system several months before the start of work on Chrome. His idea was to develop a system that rotates and Web Apps that would be kind of a big browser on top of a Linux kernel has chosen to Firefox. Ironically, Firefox OS today is not very different from that principle.
In 2006, Nelson was developing Web Apps for Google and was particularly frustrated by existing browsers, including their slow start.
While SSDs are still very expensive, his whole system was placed on a RAM-disk, extremely fast launch Firefox went from 45 seconds to 1 second. The RAM-drives have the disadvantage of losing all their data if the power is off: it was not a problem for Nelson, as were all the apps and Web Apps that all data was backed up online. Even today, Google boasts that Chrome OS prevents any data loss. But at the time, Google executives were not convinced by the proposed Nelson, who resumed certainly a well-known concept, the thin client, but wanted to get him out of businesses and institutions. The main criticism was the lack of an offline mode, a default set from the local cache with HTML5.
Why Nelson chose WebKit browser rather than Firefox? He does not say, but his choice may be related to the bad reputation of Apple's, she took three years to make open-source WebKit completely. In 2006, WebKit open source was only a few months, while Gecko was eight years. The decision to abandon Opera Presto divided in favor of WebKit web players today, with arguments reminiscent of the time. Some, including Nitot and behind the Mozilla Foundation, worry that the project led by the heavyweights Apple and Google stifles innovation that only competition and guarantee diversity.
They remind Opera is behind many innovations such as tabs, integrated search, gesture shortcuts, "top sites", etc.., A feature that could be erased with this rallying WebKit, piloted by two companies have their own objectives. Others recall with the WHATWG, Apple developers, Mozilla and Opera have greatly evolved in recent years the Web (HTML5, Microdata, etc.), and there is no reason to change that. They point out that while they share the same engine, Safari and Chrome are very different, Google and Apple working on two different JavaScript engines, two different concepts of interface and two different synchronization services. And there is no reason Opera does not continue to distinguish these three aspects.
While SSDs are still very expensive, his whole system was placed on a RAM-disk, extremely fast launch Firefox went from 45 seconds to 1 second. The RAM-drives have the disadvantage of losing all their data if the power is off: it was not a problem for Nelson, as were all the apps and Web Apps that all data was backed up online. Even today, Google boasts that Chrome OS prevents any data loss. But at the time, Google executives were not convinced by the proposed Nelson, who resumed certainly a well-known concept, the thin client, but wanted to get him out of businesses and institutions. The main criticism was the lack of an offline mode, a default set from the local cache with HTML5.
Why Nelson chose WebKit browser rather than Firefox? He does not say, but his choice may be related to the bad reputation of Apple's, she took three years to make open-source WebKit completely. In 2006, WebKit open source was only a few months, while Gecko was eight years. The decision to abandon Opera Presto divided in favor of WebKit web players today, with arguments reminiscent of the time. Some, including Nitot and behind the Mozilla Foundation, worry that the project led by the heavyweights Apple and Google stifles innovation that only competition and guarantee diversity.
They remind Opera is behind many innovations such as tabs, integrated search, gesture shortcuts, "top sites", etc.., A feature that could be erased with this rallying WebKit, piloted by two companies have their own objectives. Others recall with the WHATWG, Apple developers, Mozilla and Opera have greatly evolved in recent years the Web (HTML5, Microdata, etc.), and there is no reason to change that. They point out that while they share the same engine, Safari and Chrome are very different, Google and Apple working on two different JavaScript engines, two different concepts of interface and two different synchronization services. And there is no reason Opera does not continue to distinguish these three aspects.